It offers a dark black and thus contrasts that no other technology can achieve. The top feature of the OLED panel is how it displays light gradations. That still looks razor-sharp for a 14-inch screen. Instead of 3840 × 2160 pixels, it has 2880 × 1800 - that is WQHD+ or 2.8K instead of 4K. I am thrilled, even though it does not have UHD resolution. I watched movies with Dolby Vision in a darkened room with the Yoga 9i during my Ticino vacation, which was pure enjoyment. Compared to Microsoft's Surface Pen, it feels a bit rougher with Lenovo's pen - which I like better. This makes the display feel similar to paper when drawing and writing. You can flip the display up to 360 degrees before scribbling away on it. I'll measure both of these below.Īlso included is a metal pen, which fits well in the hand thanks to six edges like a pencil. Further, it is supposed to be bright up to 400 nits and cover the DCI-P3 color space 100 percent. It is 14 inches, has multi-touch and pen support, 2880 × 1800 pixels (243 ppi, 16:10 format) and is glossy. If you buy a Yoga 9i, you also get a case, which not only holds the device, but also the included pen. I took another look at Lenovo's data sheet - they really call it that. The notebook is also available in Oatmeal, which actually means oatmeal, but stands for silver here. The test device is Storm Grey in color and has a CNC-milled aluminum case. Intel Iris Xe Graphics – bis 1,4 GHz, 96 Execution Unitsġ4" OLED Multi-Touch Display, 2880 × 1800 Pixel, glänzend, 90 Hz, 400 Nits, Dolby Vision, HDR 500, 100 % DCI-P3, unterstützt Stifteingabe (Pen in Lieferumfang), 360° umklappbar (Tablet-Modus)Ģ × Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C), 1 × USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, 1 × USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 3,5-mm-Klinkenanschluss (Kopfhörer-Mikrofon-Combo-Jack)ĭolby Atmos optimierte Stereolautsprecher mit zwei 3 Watt Woofers und zwei 2 Watt Tweeters, zwei Array-MikrofoneĢ-Megapixel-Frontkamera (1080p-Video) und Infrarot-Kamera (Windows-Hello-Gesichtserkennung), Kameraschieber zur Linsenabdeckung Cinebench simply uses max cpu all the time, the others emulate normal workload more (opening apps, processing files, web browsing, video stuff).Īll this started when I felt my new laptop (the S540-13ARE) was a bit slowish when using it on battery, I started testing by simply opening apps on the i7-8550u vs the Ryzen 7 4800u and the i7 opened them faster just about all the time.Intel Core i7-1260P – 12 Cores (4 Performance-Cores 2,1-4,7 GHz + 8 Efficient-Cores 1,5-3,4 GHz), 16 Threads, 18 MB Smart Cache My feeling is that when stressed continuously the cpu is allowed to use more power, but for shorter boosts it's consumption is reduced. Geekbench 4 and 5, PC Mark 8 and 10 and PerformanceTest 10 DO suffer (making me think cinebench is the odd one out ) )Ĭinebench scales nicely to the power settings and is also way less affected by working on battery vs on charger, the others all are hit way harder on the battery vs charger thing and also aren't (or are hardly at most) affected by all the power setting changes. Will see if I can test some more with the slim7 this weekend.Ĭinebench is the only app that doesn't seem to suffer from it. Did try all kinds of tweaks and power settings to improve it, without luck. Perhaps with the others it just takes longer for the cpu to decide 'ok, lets ramp it up'. I think it might be something with how aggressively it boosts? Cinebench just measures max cpu continuously, the rest does more short task testing (real life so to say). Performance on battery was also lower then 'battery saver' settings on charger. With that I did tests with Cinebench R15 and R20, Geekbench 4 and 5, PerformanceTest10, PCMark8 and PCMark 10.Īll but Cinebench showed the same results, performance on battery being just about the same regardless of any power or battery settings (and lower then batterysaving mode on charger). (Changing the lenovo performance settings, windows power options, battery settings, customizing power controls manually). With that one I tried just about everything without luck. True, but with the baseclock being 1800 (4800u) vs 2900 (4800H) I thought that might make a difference.Īnd while I haven't extensively tested it with the slim7 yet (only got it yesterday afternoon) I experienced the same with the S540 (also a 4800u).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |